People v. Stoudemire
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLevin, J.
The habitual offender statute provides escalating penalties for persons repeatedly convicted of felonies.1 A life sentence may be imposed on a fourth-felony offender where the fourth felony is punishable by a term of five years or more. The question presented is whether Stoudemire was properly charged as an habitual offender with three prior convictions where the three convictions arose out of a single transaction. We hold that he could only be charged as a second offender, reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals, and remand for trial on the principal charge and a supplemental…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- People v. McFarlinMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
- People v. MorseNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- People v. GowaskyNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Dye v. SkeenWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1950
- People v. PalmMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- People v. GardnerMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
- People v. ChambersMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
- People v. BettisteaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
- People v. TuckerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
- People v. PreussMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.