Legal Opinion

Hammett v. Hunter

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 9, 1941No. 30151PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.

Plaintiff below appeals from the judgment of the district court rendered on a directed verdict for defendant in an action for slander.

The defense was that the alleged defamatory utterance was made by defendant while testifying in his own behalf in a judicial proceeding had subsequent to judgment in a divorce action wherein he was defendant, and was made not only in response to a question by counsel on cross-examination but was pertinent to the issue then being tried, and that the same was therefore a privileged statement for which he may not be held liable in a civil action for slander.

The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bland v. Lawyer-Cuff Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  2. German-American Ins. Co. v. HuntleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Sanford v. HowardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  4. Weil v. LyndsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Gaylord Entertainment Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
  2. Kirschstein v. HaynesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
  3. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. DobbsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
  4. Cooper v. Parker-HugheySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  5. Wynn v. EarinWashington Supreme Court · 2008

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API