Weil v. Lynds
Supreme Court of Kansas
Appeal from Doniphan district court; Arthur C. Bell, judge pro tem.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Mason, J.:
Sol Weil brought an action against John H. Lynds for slander. A demurrer to the plaintiff’s evidence was sustained, and he appeals.
1. The words on which the action was based, as set out in the petition, were: “He embezzled one thousand dollars or more from me in the La Cygne transaction alone.” The evidence was that the defendant had said of the plaintiff that he “had embezzled a thousand dollars, or more than a thousand dollars, in the La Cygne transaction alone.” The defendant claims that there is a fatal variance between the allegation…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Yaselli v. GoffCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
- Froelich v. AdairSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
- Murphy v. AA MathewsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
- Clear Water Truck Co., Inc. v. M. Bruenger & Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1974
- Hammett v. HunterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.