Legal Opinion

Weil v. Lynds

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 8, 1919No. 22,107PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from Doniphan district court; Arthur C. Bell, judge pro tem.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mason, J.:

Sol Weil brought an action against John H. Lynds for slander. A demurrer to the plaintiff’s evidence was sustained, and he appeals.

1. The words on which the action was based, as set out in the petition, were: “He embezzled one thousand dollars or more from me in the La Cygne transaction alone.” The evidence was that the defendant had said of the plaintiff that he “had embezzled a thousand dollars, or more than a thousand dollars, in the La Cygne transaction alone.” The defendant claims that there is a fatal variance between the allegation…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. Yaselli v. GoffCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
  2. Froelich v. AdairSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  3. Murphy v. AA MathewsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  4. Clear Water Truck Co., Inc. v. M. Bruenger & Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  5. Hammett v. HunterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API