Legal Opinion
Fageol v. Midboe
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided April 6, 1932No. Patent Appeal 2924Published
1Opinion of the Court
56 F.2d 867 (1932)
FAGEOL
v.
MIDBOE.
Patent Appeal No. 2924.
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.
April 6, 1932.
Strauch & Hoffman, of Washington, D. C. (James A. Hoffman, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for appellant.
Redding, Greeley, O'Shea & Campbell, of New York City (Worthington Campbell, of New York City, of counsel), for appellee.
Before GRAHAM, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, GARRETT, and LENROOT, Associate Judges.
GRAHAM, Presiding Judge.
An interference was declared on September 21, 1926, by the United States Patent Office between the application of Rollie B. Fageol, the appellant,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Automatic Weighing Mach. Co. v. Pneumatic Scale Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1909
- In Re TuckerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1932
- Van Auken v. CummingsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
- Gowen v. HendryCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
- Braren v. HornerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.