Legal Opinion

Pontious v. American Motorists Insurance

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 22, 1930No. 22369. Department OnePublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

The plaintiff, Pontious, seeks recovery of attorney’s fees incurred by him in defending a claim of damages prosecuted against him for personal injuries resulting from an automobile accident against which he was insured by the defendant insurance company. A trial in the superior court for Cowlitz county, sitting without a jury, resulted in findings and judgment awarding to the plaintiff recovery in the sum of five hundred dollars against the defendant, from which it has appealed to this court.

The cause is before us for decision upon the findings of the superior court, which, in so far as need…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McKenna v. International Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. Northwest Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1957
  2. The Western Casualty and Surety Company, a Corporation v. Margy Herman, Mark Lowell Herman, and Leo NewmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963
  3. Mid-States Insurance v. BrandonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1950
  4. Western States Mutual Automobile Insurance v. MayAppellate Court of Illinois · 1958
  5. Baumann v. Puget Sound Title Insurance Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API