Legal Opinion

Baumann v. Puget Sound Title Insurance Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1935No. 25542. Department TwoPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlake, J.

On December 4th, 1930, plaintiffs loaned one thousand dollars to one Aust, who, on the same day, executed and delivered to them his promissory note, secured by a mortgage on real property in Lewis county. The mortgage contained a covenant that the property was “free from all incumbrances.” Under the same date, the defendant issued a title insurance policy by which it insured plaintiffs against loss or damage, not exceeding one thousand dollars, by reason of any. incumbrance on the property impairing the security of their mortgage, except as “noted in annexed Schedule B.” At that time, there…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Puget Sound Improvement Co. v. Frankfort Marine, Accident & Plate Glass InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  2. McKenna v. International Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Clark v. SchwaeglerWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Pontious v. American Motorists InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. Northwest Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Securities Service, Inc. v. Transamerica Title InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API