Legal Opinion
The Western Casualty and Surety Company, a Corporation v. Margy Herman, Mark Lowell Herman, and Leo Newman
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided June 13, 1963No. 17203PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MATTHES, Circuit Judge.
The basic question for determination in this declaratory judgment action instituted by The Western Casualty and Surety Company (Western) is whether an automobile liability insurance policy issued by it was in force and effect at the time the automobile covered by the-policy was involved in an accident. The trial court found that the policy was effective and that the person driving the automobile at the time was entitled to indemnity from Western under the “omnibus” clause and within the policy’s limits for liability to an occupant of the automobile who was injured in…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Muriel Jeanne Homolla v. Shirley C. GluckCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1957
- Security Insurance Company Of New Haven v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
- Osborne v. Security InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Kelso v. KelsoSupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY ASSURANCE CORP. LTD. v. VellaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. MFA Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1972
- Carmen N. Salerno v. The Western Casualty & Surety Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964
- Western Casualty and Surety Company v. Mark L. HermanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
- Apex Mining Company, Inc., a Corporation v. Chicago Copper & Chemical Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.