Legal Opinion

Oxweld Acetylene Co. v. Hughes

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 23, 1915PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Harford County. (HakLAN, J.) The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtUrne-r, J.

The appellant corporation is engaged in the manufacture and sale of acetylene lighting equipments. One of its sales agents was furnished meals, lodging and automobile service by the appellee at an aggregate charge of $402.95. A suit was brought and judgment recovered against the appellant company for the full amount of the expense thus incurred by its agent. The main question to be considered on this appeal is whether the evidence in the record is legally sufficient to support such a liability..

The services for which the appellee claims compensation from the Acetylene Company were rendered in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Brager v. LevyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1914
  2. Lowes v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1915
  3. White v. BrambleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1914
  4. Bentley v. DoggettWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Howe Machine Co. v. AshleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1877

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Posko v. Climatic Control Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1951
  2. Atlantic Trust Co. v. Subscribers to Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1926
  3. Deane v. Big Spring Distilling Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1921
  4. Wilson v. BlausteinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1924
  5. Conservation Co. v. StimpsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1920

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API