Wilson v. Blaustein
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtBoyd, C. J.
The appellants sued the appellee for damages .alleged to have been sustained by them for loss by a. tire' claimed to have been caused by the negligence of the defendant, while delivering gasoline and “amoco” from an automobile tank truck into the plaintiffs! underground tanks in Rising Sun, Md. The plaintiffs had for some years been engaged in buying and selling gasoline, and also conducted a garage in Rising Sun. At the conclusion of the plaintiffs! case, a verdict in favor of the defendant was ■ rendered by direction of the court, which granted three prayers — the first, that there was no…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Baltimore & Potomac Railroad v. ReaneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1875
- Strasburger v. VogelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1906
- Consolidated Gas Co. v. GettyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1903
- County Commissioners v. WiseCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1891
- Jordan v. James & Holstrom Piano Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1922
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Peterson v. UnderwoodCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
- Rawls v. Hochschild, Kohn & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1955
- Moore v. American Stores Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1936
- Frenkil v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1939
- Armour & Co. v. LeasureCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1939
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.