Commonwealth v. Thomas
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtGants, C.J.
These interlocutory appeals from two rulings on motions to suppress raise three substantial issues regarding eyewitness identification. First, we consider what consequence, if any, is appropriate where a police officer who is showing a photographic array to an eyewitness fails to use the protocol that we outlined in Commonwealth v. Silva-Santiago, 453 Mass. 782, 797-798 (2009), despite our declaration in that opinion that we “expect” police to use the protocol in the future. Second, we examine whether, based on subsequent research, we should revisit the conclusion we reached in…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- People v. RodriguezNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- State v. HendersonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2011
- L.L., a juvenile v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
- Commonwealth v. CraytonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
- Commonwealth v. DiGiambattistaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Commonwealth v. GerhardtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2017
- State v. MartinezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2020
- Commonwealth v. CarlsonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018
- Commonwealth v. GalipeauMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018
- COMMONWEALTH v. ANTHONY TRAVIS.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2022
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.