Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Gerhardt

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided September 19, 2017No. SJC 11967PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGaziano, J.

In this case we are asked to consider the admissibility of field sobriety tests (FSTs) where a police officer suspects that a driver has been operating while under the influence of marijuana. Police typically administer three FSTs — the “horizontal gaze nystagmus test,” the “walk and turn test,” and the “one leg stand test” — during a motor vehicle stop in order to assess motorists suspected of operating while under the influence of alcohol or other drugs. These tests were developed specifically to measure alcohol consumption, and there is widespread scientific agreement on the existence of a…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Commonwealth v. LaniganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
  3. Commonwealth v. YesilcimanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  4. Commonwealth v. MutinaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  5. Commonwealth v. LaCorteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Thomas v. Town of SalisburyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018
  2. Northstar Financial Advisors v. Schwab InvestmentsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  3. Commonwealth v. DavisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2019
  4. Chang v. WinklevossMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2019
  5. Commonwealth v. WebsterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API