People v. Rodriguez
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Kaye, J.
This appeal centers on the "confirmatory identification” exception to the notice and hearing requirements of the Criminal Procedure Law for suggestive pretrial identification procedures. We conclude that, where a citizen eyewitness claimed to have seen the defendant numerous times in a store, it was error to deny defendant’s Wade hearing motions summarily, because the witness’ assertion did not establish such familiarity with defendant that the danger of police suggestiveness was eliminated as a matter of law.
I
On August 22, 1986, David Benito — employed as a clerk…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- People v. GissendannerNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- People v. DodtNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- People v. WhartonNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- People v. TasNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by378 opinions
- People v. MendozaNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Commonwealth v. CraytonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
- People v. BrelandNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- People v. DixonNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- People v. BoyerNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
373 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.