Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Galipeau

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided May 16, 2018No. AC 16-P-754PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHanlon, J.

*226 After a jury trial, the defendant, Robert Galipeau, was convicted of armed robbery arising from the gunpoint theft of cash from three men at approximately A.M. on April 18, 2013, immediately after the victims left the Assembly Bar in Quincy. The sole issue at trial was the identification of the robber. The defendant argues on appeal that his motion to suppress a photographic identification should have been allowed and that the trial judge improperly allowed an in-court identification. We affirm.

1. Motion to suppress photographic identification . "We recite the facts as found by the motion…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CraytonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
  2. Commonwealth v. Silva-SantiagoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
  3. Commonwealth v. PaszkoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  4. Commonwealth v. LacyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  5. Commonwealth v. WalkerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CraytonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018
  2. COMMONWEALTH v. JOSE SANTIAGO.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2022
  3. Commonwealth v. Jose PineroMassachusetts Superior Court · 2025
  4. Commonwealth v. Kamal OliverMassachusetts Superior Court · 2025
  5. Commonwealth v. MontanezMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API