Legal Opinion
Srager v. Koenig
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 3, 1996No. 14859PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDupont, C. J.
The defendant filed a motion to dismiss this appeal and for the sanction of attorney’s fees because the plaintiffs’ counsel abused the appellate pro*618cess. After granting the motion to dismiss the appeal, we held a hearing on June 5,1996, to address the defendant’s motion for sanctions. We grant the defendant’s motion for sanctions and, further, sua sponte, prohibit the plaintiffs’ counsel from filing any papers in this court and from making an appearance in this court for a period of six months.
The facts that are relevant to an understanding of the defendant’s motion for sanctions follow. This…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- In Re GriffithsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Heslin v. Connecticut Law Clinic of Trantolo & TrantoloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Statewide Grievance Committee v. RozbickiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. PeckSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1914
- Rosenthal v. State Bar Examining CommitteeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Talit v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Trantolo v. State, No. Cv 97-0569475s (Jun. 8, 1999)Connecticut Superior Court · 1999
- Doe v. Hospital for Special Care, No. Cv-97-0570396-S (Dec. 24, 1997)Connecticut Superior Court · 1997
- Miller v. Appellate CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
- Pac v. AlthamConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.