Legal Opinion · Dissent

Pac v. Altham

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided July 21, 1998No. AC 17715Published

1DissentFoti, J.

While I agree that the matter should be reversed and remanded, I must respectfully disagree with the majority’s decision to consider this appeal on its merits and to remand it for “further consideration of the exemption claim.”

“If a party shall fail to defend against an appeal with proper diligence, the court may set aside in whole or in part the judgment under attack, with costs, and direct the entry of an appropriate final judgment by the trial court against the party guilty of the failure. . . .” Practice Book (1998 Rev.) § 85-1, formerly § 4184A. Other “[ajctions which may result in the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re PresnickConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
  2. Srager v. KoenigConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  3. Feuerman v. FeuermanConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API