Legal Opinion
Miller v. Eighth Utilities District
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 12, 1980PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCotter, C. J.
The defendants’ appeal arises out of a cause of action brought by the plaintiffs 1 who seek to consolidate the Eighth Utilities District (hereinafter the district) and the town of Manchester in accordance with the procedure providing for the consolidation of two or more units of local government 2 pursuant to the Home Rule Act, §§ 7-195 through 7-201 of the General Statutes. Although requested by the plaintiffs, the defendants 3 refused to appoint, by joint resolution, a commission which, under § 7-198, was a prerequisite for further consolidation proceedings and without which the plaintiffs’…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Walker v. JankuraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Burke v. Board of RepresentativesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
- MacK v. SaarsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
- State Ex Rel. Sloane v. ReidySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
- Caulfield v. NobleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. DabkowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Keeney v. Town of Old SaybrookSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- All Brand Importers, Inc. v. Department of Liquor ControlSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Windham First Taxing District v. Town of WindhamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Highgate Condominium Ass'n v. Watertown Fire DistrictSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.