Legal Opinion
Caulfield v. Noble
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 26, 1979PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*82Longo, J.
The plaintiff, a resident and taxpayer of the town of New Canaan, appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court denying his application for a writ of mandamus in which he sought, inter alia, to compel the defendant selectmen, tax collector and members of the New Canaan board of finance to fix a new mill rate for the town for the fiscal year 1977, which began September 1, 1976.
The essential facts, as stipulated by the parties in the trial court and disclosed in the court’s finding, reveal the following: On October 19, 1976, the board of finance of New Canaan met in official session…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Kellems v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Jennings v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- West Coast Advertising Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Hurlbut v. LemelinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Fragley v. PhelanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Carofano v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- City of Shelton v. CommissionerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- McKinley v. MusshornSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Conto v. Zoning Commission of WashingtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Windham First Taxing District v. Town of WindhamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.