Legal Opinion

Washington International Insurance v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided April 17, 1989No. 490-88CPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NETTESHEIM, Judge.

This case is before the court after argument and supplemental briefing on defendant’s contested motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

FACTS

The following facts are well pleaded and undisputed. Washington International Insurance Company (“plaintiff”) is a corporate surety authorized by the United States Customs Service (“Customs”) to write single-entry bonds used by importers to gain entry of merchandise into the United States. During 1984 plaintiff issued approximately 46 entry bonds for Philip Lee-mack, d/b/a S & P Trading (“Leemack”), securing…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Algonac Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
  3. Balboa Insurance Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
  4. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
  5. Howard Smithson and Maretta Smithson v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mega Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
  2. Ransom v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
  3. Hartford Fire Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
  4. Home Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
  5. Intercargo Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API