Legal Opinion

Ransom v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 13, 1989No. 229-84CPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRUGGINK, Judge.

The case is presently before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss Count I and for summary judgment as to Count II, and on plaintiff’s cross-motion for summary judgment as to Count I, and for partial summary judgment as to Count II. The two counts of the complaint raise the following questions: Count I) When the United States is obligee on a bid bond, is it contractually obligated to pass along to the bid bondsmen information relevant to the risk being secured, so that if it does not do so, the bondsmen are relieved of their subsequent assumption of duties under…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Boyle v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. United States v. Little Lake Misere Land Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. William A. Ransom and Robert D. Nesen v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  2. American Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
  3. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  4. Hartford Fire Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
  5. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API