Legal Opinion

Intercargo Insurance v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided August 4, 1998No. 96-467CPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LYDON, Senior Judge.

In this contract case, plaintiff, acting as a Miller Act surety for a Government contractor, seeks enforcement of its right of equitable subrogation against the Government as a result of its payment, by way of a settlement under the payment bond it issued to the contractor, to the supplier of specially manufactured materials ordered by the .contractor, who never paid said supplier and the materials were never delivered to the work site.

Defendant has moved to dismiss plaintiffs complaint for lack of. jurisdiction on two grounds. First, defendant contends that…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Pearlman v. Reliance InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. United States v. Munsey Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Pure Gold, Inc. v. Syntex (u.s.a.), Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Westchester Fire Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
  2. Hartford Fire Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API