Legal Opinion

Moler v. Mabe

District Court, E.D. Kentucky

Decided December 2, 2019No. 6:19-cv-00203Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY SOUTHERN DIVISION LONDON ARTHUR FLEMMING MOLER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) Civil Action No. 6:19-203-GFVT ) v. ) ) CHRISTOPHER STOVALL, et al., ) MEMORANDUM OPINION ) & Defendant. ) ORDER ) *** *** *** *** Federal inmate Arthur Moler has filed a pro se civil rights complaint alleging various claims against numerous defendants. [R. 1.] Under the Prison Litigation Reform Act (“PLRA”), the Court conducts a preliminary screening of the complaint. See, e.g., 28 U.S.C. § 1915; Hill v. Lappin,

630 F.3d 468, 470-71

(6th Cir. 2010). For the reasons that…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API