Legal Opinion

Hilburn v. Enerpipe, Ltd.

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided March 11, 2016No. 112765PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Arnold-Burger, J.:

While Diana K. Hilburn rode home with her husband, a truck owned and operated by Enerpipe, Ltd. (En-erpipe) rear-ended their car. The collision negatively impacted Hil-bum’s recovery from a recent back surgeiy, resulting in a second surgery and chronic pain. After a trial, a jury returned a verdict in the amount of $335,000 in total damages for Hilburn, most of which compensated for her noneconomic losses. Over Hilburn’s objection, the district court reduced her damages pursuant to the Kansas noneconomic loss damages statute, K.S.A. 60-19a02.

On appeal, Hilburn challenges the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Manzanares v. BellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  2. Bair v. PeckSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
  3. Samsel v. Wheeler Transport Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1990
  4. Spruill Motors, Inc. v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  5. Miller v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hilburn v. Enerpipe Ltd.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2019
  2. Hilburn v. Enerpipe Ltd.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2019
  3. Hilburn v. Enerpipe Ltd.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API