Youngblood v. Wilson & Cureton
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
MASSEY, Chief Justice.
From a judgment for attorneys, the plaintiffs Wilson and Cureton, in a suit for attorney’s fees and for attorney’s fees for their collection under Article 2226, Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St, defendant J. W. Young-blood appealed.
Judgment affirmed.
The defendant protests the recovery by the lawyer plaintiffs of attorney’s fees for the representation of them by an attorney. The contention is that the provisions therefor in Article 2226, where the suit is for “personal services rendered, labor done,” was intended to apply in cases where the plaintiff was a laborer, servant, clerk,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Huff v. Fidelity Union Life Insurance CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1958
- Urschel v. CrowCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
3Cited by7 opinions
- McLeod Alexander, Powel & Apffel, P.C. v. Fred H. QuarlesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Stevens v. Travelers Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1978
- Magids v. DormanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
- Campbell, Athey & Zukowski v. Albert F. ThomassonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- McHale v. Lake Charles American PressLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.