Legal Opinion

Campbell, Athey & Zukowski v. Albert F. Thomasson

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 20, 1989No. 88-2136PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge:

Campbell, Athey & Zukowski (“CAZ”), a Houston, Texas, law firm, sued Albert and Burgess Thomasson for over $20,000 in attorneys’ fees owed the firm. 1 After a bench trial, the district court found that, under Texas law, the Thomassons had breached their contract with CAZ and ordered them to pay $20,530.36 plus post-judgment interest. Neither party contests the damages award; CAZ, however, appeals, arguing that the district court erred by (1) refusing to award them reasonable attorneys’ fees for bringing suit and recovering on its claim against the Thomassons, and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Cavnar v. Quality Control Parking, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. La Sara Grain Co. v. First National Bank of MercedesTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Abell v. Potomac Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
  4. Perry Roofing Co. v. OlcottTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Matthews v. DeSotoTexas Supreme Court · 1986

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Rohrmoos Venture, Eric Langford, Dan Basso, and Tobin Grove v. Utsw DVA Healthcare, LlpTexas Supreme Court · 2019
  2. McLeod Alexander, Powel & Apffel, P.C. v. Fred H. QuarlesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
  3. AMX Enterprises, L.L.P. v. Master Realty Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2009
  4. Enserch Corp. v. Shand Morahan & Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  5. Resolution Trust Corporation, as Conservator for Columbia Federal Savings and Loan Association v. Stephen G. Marshall, Lloyd G. Williams, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API