Legal Opinion

Magids v. Dorman

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 19, 1968No. 131PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARRON, Justice.

This is a suit by appellee, W. T. Dorman, an attorney at law, to recover $14,099.84, for legal services allegedly rendered the Estate of Fannie N. Magids, deceased. Dorman was employed by appellant, Charles Magids, independent executor of the estate. The case was tried with the aid of a jury, and the jury found that ap-pellee’s services rendered to the estate were of a reasonable value of $500.00, and that the value of the services rendered in this suit by Dorman’s attorney were of a reasonable value of $1,500.00. The trial court rendered judgment on the verdict in favor of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gulf Paving Co. v. LofstedtTexas Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Huff v. Fidelity Union Life Insurance CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Texas Life Ins. Co. v. HatchCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  4. American Nat. Ins. Co. v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  5. Weatherly v. LongoriaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Flint & Associates v. Intercontinental Pipe & Steel, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1987
  2. Russell v. City of Bryan, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1996
  3. Rocha v. Ahmad, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1984
  4. Caldwell & Hurst v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986
  5. Estate of Kaiser v. Gifford, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1985

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API