Legal Opinion
Cecil v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 23, 1943No. Civ. 14048PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShinn, Acting P. J.
The Director of Agriculture of the State of California, who is the petitioner in this proceeding in prohibition, seeks to stay further steps in a mandamus proceeding pending against him in the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, upon the ground that his motion for change of venue to the county of his residence (Sacramento) was improperly denied.
It is not questioned that petitioner did reside in the county of Sacramento at the time the proceeding was instituted in the superior court and at the time of his motion for change of venue. It is conceded that he was not entitled to the order he…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- McMillan v. RichardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
- State Ex Rel. Florida Dry Cleaning & Laundry Board v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
- Montana-Dakota Utilities Co. v. PubLic Service CommissionMontana Supreme Court · 1940
- Bonestell, Richardson & Co. v. CurryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- State Commission in Lunacy v. WelchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Regents of University of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Lake County Riverboat L.P. v. Illinois Gaming BoardAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
- Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v. Denver & Rio Grande Western RailroadDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1968
- State Ex Rel. State Board of Education v. District Court of Bryan CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
- State ex rel. Oklahoma Tax Commission v. District Court of Nowata CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.