State Commission in Lunacy v. Welch
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Alameda County refusing a change of the place of trial. William H. Waste, Judge. Tbe facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This is an appeal from an order denying a motion of the defendant for a change of the place of trial.
The action was begun in the superior court of Alameda County. It is a proceeding in mandamus against the defend ant, as treasurer of San Benito County, to compel him as such treasurer, to pay to the state treasurer the sum of $1460, alleged to be due the state from the defendant as treasurer of San Benito County, on account of children committed from said county to the California Home for Feeble Minded Children. The defendant resides in San Benito County. He asks for a change of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- McMillan v. RichardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
- Hill v. DenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1879
- Bonestell, Richardson & Co. v. CurryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. LundhighIdaho Supreme Court · 1917
- Cecil v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Legarreta Ruiz v. Tesorero de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1939
- Harris v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Stoneham v. RushenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.