Legal Opinion

Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad v. Moran

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 1900PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from the Bran ch Appellate Court for the First District;—heard in that court on appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. E. F. Dunne, Judge, presiding.

1Per curiam

In affirming the deóree in this case the following statement was made and opinion rendered by the Branch Appellate Court:

“This is a petition for a mechanic’s lien under the Railroad Lien statute, against appellant and one Chapman, as original contractor.
“In April, 1892, appellant entered into a contract with Chapman for the construction of about forty-six miles of track between Danville and Momence, Illinois. Four days thereafter Chapman entered into a contract with Moran, the appellee, sub-letting to the latter a portion of the work. The sub-contract was identical with the main contract in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Elgin v. JoslynIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Worrell v. ForsythIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  3. City of Elgin v. JoslynAppellate Court of Illinois · 1890

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Mendelson v. Ben A. Borenstein & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  2. Fuchs v. PetersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Becker v. BeckerIllinois Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Evans v. HowellIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Headley v. CavileerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1912

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API