King v. Inland Steel Co.
Indiana Supreme Court
From Lake Superior Court; Virgil 8. Reiter, Judge. Action by Martin S. King against the Inland Steel Company. From a judgment for defendant, the plaintiff appeals. (Transferred from the Appellate Court under §1405 Bums 1908, Acts 1901 p. 590.)
1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.
This appeal is an action brought by appellant against appellee to recover damages for personal injuries. A demurrer was sustained to appellant’s amended complaint by the lower court, and that ruling is assigned by appellant as error.
1. Counsel for appellee make the point that appellant has not presented a record to this court which presents the question. The transcript contains the entry of the filing of the amended complaint, the amended complaint, the entry showing the filing of appellee’s demurrer to it, the demurrer, the ruling of the court sustaining the demurrer and appellant’s…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Davis v. Mercer Lumber Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1905
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
- Monteith v. Kokomo Wood Enameling Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1902
- United States Cement Co. v. CooperIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
- Bessler v. LaughlinIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Chicago & Erie Railroad v. DiniusIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
- Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. ClarkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
- Hayes Freight Lines, Inc. v. WilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1948
- Schmitt v. F. W. Cook Brewing Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1918
- Citizens Telephone Co. v. PrickettIndiana Supreme Court · 1919
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.