Legal Opinion

Maxey v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 17, 1938No. 26,967PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTremain, J.

—The appellant was prosecuted by affidavit and convicted of the crime of receiving stolen goods. His motion for a new trial was overruled.

Upon appeal to this court he has assigned as error, and relied upon for a reversal, instructions given by the court of its own motion to the jury, numbered from 1 to 26 inclusive. Neither the state nor appellant tendered to and requested the court to give other instructions. In the preparation of his brief appellant expressly waived any error predicated upon instructions numbered 1, 2, 3, 4, 9, 20, 23, 24, and 26, and has not set them out in any form in his…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Simplex Railway Appliance Co. v. Western Rawhide & Belting Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Waters v. Indianapolis Traction & Terminal Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wood v. C. E.R.R. Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Hooper v. PreussIndiana Court of Appeals · 1941
  3. Parker v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Perez v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. Wood v. Chicago & Erie RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API