Legal Opinion

Cromwell v. . Logan and Logan v. . Mercantile Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 23, 1929PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClaeksoN, J.

It is tbe well settled rule of practice and tbe accepted position in tbis jurisdiction tbat, on a motion to nonsuit, tbe evidence wbicb makes for tbe plaintiff’s claim, and wbicb tends to support ber cause of action, wbetber offered by tbe plaintiff or elicited from tbe defendant’s witnesses, will be taken and considered in its most favorable light for tbe plaintiff, and sbe is “entitled to tbe benefit of every reasonable intendment upon tbe evidence and every reasonable inference to be drawn therefrom.” Nash v. Royster, 189 N. C., at p. 410.

Tbe jury only passed on tbe issue of actionable…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Peyton v. . GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  2. Dunbar v. Tobacco Growers Cooperative Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  3. Taylor v. . EdmundsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  4. Manufacturers' Oil & Grease Co. v. AverettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  5. Hoggard v. . BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ross v. Atlantic Greyhound Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  2. Mangum v. . BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  3. Pierce v. BiermanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  4. Wingler v. . MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  5. Insurance Co. v. . EdgertonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API