Legal Opinion

Manufacturers' Oil & Grease Co. v. Averett

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 3, 1926PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClakksoN, J.

To defeat the alleged contract, the defendant sets up actionable fraud or deceit in the procurement of the contract. The court below was of the opinion that defendant’s evidence was not sufficient to be submitted to the jury upon an issue of fraud. We cannot so hold. On the issue of fraud, the burden is on the defendant to satisfy the jury of the fraud by the greater weight of the evidence or a pre- ponderanee of the evidence. McNair v. Finance Co., 191 N. C., 715. Not so where it is proposed to correct a mistake in a deed or similar canse — -the quantum oí proof. The evidence must be clear,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dellinger v. . GillespieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  2. McNair v. Southern States Finance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  3. Western Carolina Lumber Co. v. SturgillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Manufacturing Co. v. . Building Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  2. Cromwell v. . Logan and Logan v. . Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  3. Oliver v. . HechtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  4. Harrison v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  5. Forbes v. Drexel Knitting Mill Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API