Legal Opinion

Cordray v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1942No. 29500PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTurner, J.

In the case of Goodman v. Industrial Commission, 135 Ohio St., 81, 82, 19 N. E. (2d), 508, it was said:

“It hardly seems necessary to remark that in cases of this general type the peculiar facts of the individual case are largely controlling. Here, the members of this court are unanimously of the opinion that the appellee was entitled to a directed verdict or judgment in its favor upon the rehearing record before the court, and on the basis that no injury was shown.”

Appellant in the instant case contends that the trial court should have sustained appellant’s motion for a directed verdict, for…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Industrial Commission v. FrankenOhio Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Goodman v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Industrial Commission v. LambertOhio Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Gwaltney v. General Motors Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Industrial Commission v. DavisOhio Supreme Court · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Malone v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Gerich v. Republic Steel Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Shea v. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1942
  4. McNees v. Cincinnati Street Railway Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1951
  5. Davis v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API