Davis v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.

On the evidence in this record, a jury could reasonably find that plaintiff was physically injured as a proximate result of a hazard of his employment (see McNees v. Cincinnati Street Ry. Co., 152 Ohio St., 269, 89 N. E. [2d], 138), which was greater than that to which members of the general public are ordinarily subjected (see paragraphs three and four of the syllabus of Malone v. Industrial Commission, 140 Ohio St., 292, 43 N. E. [2d], 266), that is, the hazard of injury from the heavy physical exertion required “in the performance of his work.” It does not appear however that there is any…