Legal Opinion

Industrial Commission v. Lambert

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 1933No. 23878PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephenson, J.

Counsel for claimant stand squarely on the case of Industrial Commission v. Weimer, 124 Ohio St., 50, 176 N. E., 886. It takes some stretch of the imagination to make the Weimer case fit the instant ease. The Weimer case was an infection case. There is no such question in this case. In the Weimer case the court found as a matter of fact that there was evidence in the record to the effect that there was “injury sustained by Weimer, in that the skin became worn down * * * and thus ultimately suffered small lacerations through which infection entered.”

The doctor testified in that case to the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Industrial Commission v. FrankenOhio Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Renkel v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Industrial Commission v. MiddletonOhio Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Industrial Commission v. WeimerOhio Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. American Maize Products Co. v. NichiporchikIndiana Court of Appeals · 1940
  2. Goodman v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Walborn v. General Fireproofing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Matczak v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Pfister v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1942

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API