Legal Opinion

State v. Hardy

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1971No. 71-279PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDuncan, J.

We forego comparison of Toledo v. Starks, supra, and the case at bar to discern whether they conflict, but it is apparent that there exists a general similarity of the problem in both cases regarding the jury instructions on driving while under the influence of alcohol. We are called upon to determine whether the trial judge, in instructing a jury, committed error prejudicial to the defendant.

In the instant case, we believe the trial court’s charge to be erroneous and prejudicial to the defendant for the reasons appearing hereinafter.

The trial judge in instructing the jury made two statements…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. PorterOhio Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Marcoguiseppe v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1926
  3. State v. SteeleOhio Court of Appeals · 1952
  4. City of Toledo v. StarksOhio Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. Masoncup v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 1933

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. State v. ThompsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Commonwealth v. ConnollyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  3. State v. NoorOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. State v. BlantonOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
  5. State v. SandersOhio Court of Appeals · 2010

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API