Legal Opinion

State v. Hankins

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 4, 1983No. 825SC1347Published

1Opinion of the Court

307 S.E.2d 440 (1983)

STATE of North Carolina

v.

Michael Jay HANKINS.

No. 825SC1347.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

October 4, 1983.

Atty. Gen. Rufus L. Edmisten by Sp. Deputy Atty. Gen. John R. B. Matthis and Associate Atty. Gen. Philip A. Telfer, Raleigh, for the State.

William Norton Mason, Wilmington, for defendant-appellant.

WEBB, Judge.

We believe we are bound by State v. Rushing, 61 N.C.App. 62, 300 S.E.2d 445, aff'd, 308 N.C. 804, 303 S.E.2d 822 (1983) to hold there was not sufficient evidence that the defendant intended to commit rape at the time he entered the house for a charge of first…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. McKinneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. State v. SimpsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. State v. WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  4. State v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  5. State v. RushingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API