Legal Opinion

Cookingham v. United States

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 20, 1949No. 219 of 1947, AdmiraltyPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KIRKPATRICK, Chief Judge.

This is an action in admiralty by a seaman , to recover damages for personal injuries, for maintenance and cure, and also to recover the value-of his personal effects.

The libellant, who was second cook and baker on board the Rufus W. Peckham, was going down a stairway leading to the chill box to get some food for the crew when he slipped on a substance, apparently Jello, which lay on one of the steps in a patch containing two or three tablespoonfuls, and was injured. The stairway was properly constructed and there was sufficient light."

There was no direct evidence as'…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Seas Shipping Co. v. SierackiSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. The OsceolaSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  3. Pacific Steamship Co. v. PetersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  4. German v. Carnegie-Illinois Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1946
  5. Boyce v. Seas Shipping Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cookingham v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
  2. West v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1956
  3. Guthrie v. Sinclair Refining CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
  4. Pedersen v. The Tanker BulklubeDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1959
  5. Cookingham v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API