Legal Opinion

West v. United States

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 2, 1956No. 419 of 1952PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARY, District Judge.

This action was instituted by libellant, Edgar Allen West, against the United States of America to recover damages for injuries sustained aboard the S. S. Mary Austin, a Liberty Ship owned by the respondent, United States of America. The United States impleaded the libellant’s employer, Atlantic Port Contractors, Inc. A trial was held before the Court, sitting without a jury, on February 13 and 14, 1956. Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, and briefs in support thereof, having been submitted by all of the parties, the Court makes the following

Findings of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Seas Shipping Co. v. SierackiSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Pope & Talbot, Inc. v. HawnSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. Desper v. Starved Rock Ferry Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. Guerrini v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
  5. Cookingham v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. West v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Phyllis M. Nelson, Etc., and Cross-Appellant v. United States of America, and Cross-Appellee v. Duncanson-Harrelson Co., Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  3. Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc., Helix Well Ops, Inc., and Helix Offshore International, Inc. v. Kelvin GoldTexas Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Union Carbide Corp. v. GoettCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1958
  5. Union Carbide Corp. v. GoettCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1960

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API