Legal Opinion
Cookingham v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided September 20, 1950No. 10142_1Published
1Opinion of the Court
184 F.2d 213
COOKINGHAM
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 10142.
United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.
Argued June 8, 1950.
Decided Sept. 20, 1950.
Abraham E. Freedman, Philadelphia, Pa. (William M. Alper and Freedman, Landy & Lorry, all of Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief) for appellant.
Thomas E. Byrne, Jr., Philadelphia, Pa. (Gerald A. Gleeson, United States Attorney, John A. Friedrich and Krusen, Evans & Shaw, all of Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.
Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and MARRIS and KALODNER, Circuit Judges.
MARIS, Circuit Judge.
1
The basic question which this case raises is whether…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Seas Shipping Co. v. SierackiSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- The OsceolaSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Mahnich v. Southern Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Calmar Steamship Corp. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Farrell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.