United States v. Batchelder
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
COX, Judge:
1. The accused stands charged with destroying, removing, or disposing of property to prevent seizure; impersonating a commissioned officer; obtaining services under false pretenses (3 specifications); and wrongfully and unlawfully obtaining telephone services (2 specifications), in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 934. The military judge granted the accused’s in limine motion to dismiss the Charge and all specifications based on lack of personal jurisdiction.
2. The Government appealed the military judge’s ruling. Art. 62,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. LovingCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1994
- In Re GrimleySupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- United States v. HowardUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
- Wickham v. HallUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
- United States v. ColeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. HarmonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
- United States v. MelansonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
- United States v. LeprestiNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1999
- United States v. KingCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
- United States v. NettlesCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2015
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.