Legal Opinion
Wahl v. Waters
California Supreme Court
Decided March 29, 1938No. Sac. 5184PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.
Upon the petition of the respondent, who is a qualified elector of, and property owner residing within, the Bidwell Municipal Utility District the superior court ordered that a peremptory writ of mandate issue, requiring the defendants, constituting the board of directors of the district, to call an election upon the question of its dissolution. The appeal is from this judgment.
The district was formed at an election held in 1934 pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Utilities District Act (Stats. 1921, p. 245; as amended. See 2 Deering’s Gen. Laws, 1931 ed., p. 3650.) Its boundaries,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Conn v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
- People Ex Rel. Skelton v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Morrison v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Morrow v. Board of Directors of Imperial Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Morrison v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Bodinson Manufacturing Co. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Johnstone v. RichardsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Jenkins v. KnightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Huffman v. KiteSupreme Court of Virginia · 1956
- Vickery v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.