Legal Opinion

Barthule v. Karman

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1994No. 94-147PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Trieweiler

Plaintiff Robert C. Barthule filed a complaint in the District Court for the Sixteenth Judicial District in Rosebud County in which Robert Karman was named as the defendant. Barthule alleged that he suffered an injury while working for Karman at a time when Karman was uninsured in violation of Montana’s workers’ compensation laws. The jury returned a verdict in Barthule’s favor and awarded him $35,000 as damages. Karman appeals from the judgment entered pursuant to the jury’s verdict. We affirm the judgment of the District Court.

The issues on appeal are restated as follows:

1. Did the District…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Interstate Production Credit Ass'n v. DesayeMontana Supreme Court · 1991
  2. In Re the Marriage of BarnardMontana Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Montana Rail Link v. ByardMontana Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Cottrell v. Burlington Northern RailroadMontana Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Hislop v. CadyMontana Supreme Court · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Kiely Construction, L.L.C. v. City of Red Lodge Ex Rel. Red Lodge City CouncilMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Giambra v. KelseyMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Werre v. DavidMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Tanner v. Dream Island, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Fillinger v. Northwestern Agency, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1997

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API