Legal Opinion

Hislop v. Cady

Montana Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 1993No. 93-296PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Nelson

Stella Hislop (Hislop) appeals from a judgment entered upon a jury verdict in the Eleventh Judicial District Court, Flathead County, in favor of Richard C. Cady (Cady). Cady appeals the District Comb’s denial of a motion for summary judgment, a pre-trial motion for a ruling that decedent’s heirs were not entitled to damages, and certain jury instructions. We affirm.

Because we affirm, the issues raised by Cady on his cross-appeal are moot. Therefore, we state the issues on appeal as follows:

1. Did the District Court err in failing to instruct the jury that Cady was negligent per se?

2. Did the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Steer, Inc. v. Department of RevenueMontana Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Story v. City of BozemanMontana Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Hart-Anderson v. HauckMontana Supreme Court · 1989
  4. VanLuchene v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1990

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Christofferson v. City of Great FallsMontana Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Fillinger v. Northwestern Agency, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. KaarmaMontana Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Onstad v. Payless ShoesourceMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Barthule v. KarmanMontana Supreme Court · 1994

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API