Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Montana Rail Link v. Byard

Montana Supreme Court

Decided September 16, 1993No. 93-103PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Nelson

Before the Court is Petitioner’s appeal from a Fourth Judicial District Court, Missoula County, order affirming the Montana Human Rights Commission determination that Montana Rail Link (MRL) discriminated against the Respondent M. Jane Byard (Byard) in violation of the Montana Human Rights Act, based on her sex. We affirm.

We restate the issues on appeal:

I. Did the hearing examiner err in allowing Byard to amend her complaint?

II. Did the hearing examiner err in allowing the testimony of Dr. Hocker?

III. Did the hearing examiner err in prohibiting the testimony of Ron Dean?

IV. Did the hearing…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Hazen Paper Co. v. BigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. State v. WarclubMontana Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Jarvenpaa v. Glacier Electric Cooperative, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Williams v. Board of County CommissionersMontana Supreme Court · 2013
  4. In re of Inquiry into M.M.Montana Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. RossMontana Supreme Court · 1995

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API