Legal Opinion

Weber v. Leuschner

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 15, 1966No. Civ. 523PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

These appeals are from a judgment for compensatory damages in the sum of $15,000 against all defendants and $7,500 exemplary damages against 'defendant Leusehner, in a malicious prosecution action. The verdict awarded $25,000 compensatory damages but upon motion for a new trial, the court ordered a new trial unless plaintiff remitted $10,000 compensatory damages, leaving intact the verdict of $7,500 exemplary damages. Plaintiff filed such a remission, and defendant Leuschner appeals from the judgment against him for both compensatory and exemplary damages, an'd all other defendants appeal…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Berniker v. BernikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Jaffe v. StoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Seffert v. Los Angeles Transit LinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  5. People v. KilvingtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Oiye v. FoxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  2. Kincaid v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1968
  3. Russell v. GeisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. Shultz Steel Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1986
  5. Taylor v. Socony Mobil Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API