Legal Opinion
Stop & Shop Supermarket Co. v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Rhode Island
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided June 24, 2004No. 03-2061PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOUDIN, Chief Judge.
Stop & Shop Supermarket Company (“Stop & Shop”) and Walgreen Eastern Co., Inc., (“Walgreen”) brought an antitrust suit against a number of defendants primarily based on section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1 (2000), lost certain of their claims on summary judgment, and then suffered a directed verdict at the jury trial held on the balance of their claims. They now appeal on several grounds as to certain defendants (the other defendants settled). We begin with a description of background events and proceedings in the district court.
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Rhode…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Board of Trade of Chicago v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Jefferson Parish Hospital District No. 2 v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Roland MacHinery Company v. Dresser Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- In Re Insurance Brokerage Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Medina-Rivera v. MVM, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
- B & H Medical, L.L.C. v. ABP Administration, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Expert Masonry, Inc. v. Boone County, Kentucky, Fiscal Court Don Salyers Masonry, Inc. Don Salyers John Doe 2Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Little Rock Cardiology Clinic PA v. Baptist HealthCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.