Medina-Rivera v. MVM, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON, Circuit Judge.
Setting the Stage
Estrella Medina-Rivera (Medina) appeals from a summary judgment dismissing her Title VII case against MVM, Inc. Medina’s husband Omar Cajigas-Quiñones (Cajigas) and their conjugal partnership also appear as plaintiffs and appellants. Their rights, however, derive from hers, so we can ignore them for now and treat her as if she were the only plaintiff-appellant— though our decision is binding on all parties, naturally. Medina offers a number of reasons why the summary-judgment ruling cannot stand. Exercising de novo review, Soto-Padró v. Pub. Bldgs.…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Jose MEDINA-MUNOZ, Etc., Et Al., Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, Defendant, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by95 opinions
- Cherkaoui v. City of QuincyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
- Germanowski v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
- Pina v. Children's PlaceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
- Ponte v. Steelcase Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
- Ray, III v. Ropes & Gray LLPCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.