Louis J. Lane v. Central Bank of Alabama, N.A.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
R. LANIER ANDERSON, III, Circuit Judge:
Louis J. Lane (“Lane”) appeals from a decision of the district court awarding summary judgment to appellee Central Bank of Alabama (“Central”). The district court held that state courts have concurrent jurisdiction to hear claims arising under the anti-tying provisions of the Bank Holding Company Act, 12 U.S.C. § 1972(1). Accordingly, Lane’s claim was deemed barred by res judicata since Lane failed to assert the federal claim in a prior state court action involving the same facts relied upon by Lane in the district court. We affirm.
The sole issue on…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Charles Dowd Box Co. v. CourtneySupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Gulf Offshore Co. v. Mobil Oil Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Arizona v. Maricopa County Medical SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Hathorn v. LovornSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Blumenstock Bros. Advertising Agency v. Curtis Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Federal National Mortgage Ass'n v. LeCroneCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- Waite v. BancTexas-Houston, N.A., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1990
- Hairston v. Travelers Casualty & SuretyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
- Diversified Foods, Inc. v. The First National Bank of BostonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- United Central Bank of Des Moines, N.A. v. KruseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1989
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.