Legal Opinion
United Central Bank of Des Moines, N.A. v. Kruse
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided April 19, 1989No. 87-1117PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CARTER, Justice.
Defendants, Nancy A. Kruse and Kevin C. Kruse, appeal from the district court’s decree foreclosing the mortgage of the plaintiff, United Central Bank of Des Moines (the bank), against their property and rejecting various affirmative defenses and counterclaims which plaintiffs had filed against the bank.
Defendants contend on appeal that the district court erred in: (1) excluding the testimony of an expert witness, (2) instructing the jury, within the context of defendants’ false representation claims, that knowledge possessed by an attorney is chargeable to the attorney’s…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lou v. BelzbergCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- CBS Inc. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Aller v. Rodgers MacHinery Mfg. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1978
- Constance I. Dubroff v. Duncan D. Dubroff, Don M. KennedyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Crookham v. RileySupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
- Diversified Foods, Inc. v. The First National Bank of BostonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- In Re Estate of OhrtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1994
- Terrell v. ReineckerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1992
- Midwest Heritage Bank, FSB v. NorthwaySupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.